Ok, Room 10, as part of your homework for this week I would like you to carefully read this piece of persuasive writing. You will recognise the topic as it is the same as the topic you have been writing about. You can comment on 1. If you think it is convincing or not and why? 2. Why you think it was written? 3.What do you think about the language that the author has used in his/her writing 4. After reading this are there any changes you think you may make to yours?
1.I think yes and no.I think yes because I agree with Quite a few of their points.I think no because they say "most cats" and not all cats so you might have a cat out of the category "most cats".
2.I think it was as an example piece of writing.I also think it was written to convince people that cats make better pets than dogs.
3.I think that the author has used technical language very well.They used lots of different time connectives and used more sophisticated words so they sounded like they knew what they were talking about.
4.I think that I'll use more sophisticated words and try to use facts that include all Cats/dogs.
1. Yes,I think this piece of writing is convincing because it made me question my own thoughts about what I had written about dogs.
2. I think this was written so that people like me who are dog lovers will question our thoughts and feelings about cats.
3. I think that the language used in the story is persuasive and catches your attention because the writter is someone who loves cats for example,"they are civilized members of the household", trying to convince the reader thats cats are like people.
4. Even though the story talks about all the positive characteristics of a cat, I still strongly beleive that dogs make better pets for example, cats cant be guide dogs for the blind, they can't be used by the Police and they can't be used as guard dogs. This shows that dogs are more intelligent and that people can trust and depend on dogs.
1; I think this piece of writing is very persuasive because the writer highlights the best feature of cats, in some cases where he/she talked bad about cat they gave us alternate information about how we can stop the problem. Also in this text they use long vocabulary words making it sound professional
2; I think personally this was written because the writer feels dogs are adulated (adored (does adulated make sense?) and wanted to let people know that cats can be just as good as dogs(or way better) and the writer probably owns a cat
3; I think the language used in this text is advanced so that it sounds professional and also the writer has put in lot's of hooks so that readers don't get bored while reading and that these types of words/language was used very well
4; some changes I want to make to mine are mainly using more advanced wording and making more interesting hooks because when I read it .. (well I don't read it because I don't like to) also I would like to add more detail and reasoning to my points
1: I personally think that this piece of persuasive writing is great !The reason why? , is the author gives us three good reasons why cats are better pets than cats.
2: I think it was written to show people the options on having a cat in your life, or if you didn't agree to have a dog.
3: The language used in this text is very professional and advanced, so the way the have written it is so you don't get bored so great vocabulary.
4: The changes I would make to mine is expanding my main points by adding more technical vocabulary.
1: i think this is persuasive because it gives more facts about cats then what we could get as a whole class.I also think it is because all the facts written is true and this person does give points.
2:I think this writing was written for the sake of cats and to persuade people that cats are far better pets then dogs.
3:The language used in this text is very mature and professional.
4:The changes i would of think to make is the changes on my points, to make them bigger and stronger because this person has true and strong points that will just put my writing to sham.Thumbs UP on this persons writing :)
I think that It's got a very persuasive introduction , as soon as you read the first 2 sentences you automatically know what the writer is trying to persuade you to do.It should be a little more gripping,so you have no choice whatsoever but to agree with the piece of writing. Apart from that I think it's very good and has nearly got me persuaded!
I think that is a very persuasive piece because...
1." A dog is a man's best friend. That common saying may contain some truth ". That hooks you in on the first couple of sentences.
2. The writer uses technical and big words which makes it look professenial also it make the arguement stronger.
3. He/she makes the arguement stronger by stating the facts. Like saying something like " cats clean themselves, the ease of care."
4. Finally the writer makes this arguement better than others by the way the layed it out. The writer has different paragraphs for the Intro, The 3 paragrpahs with the reason and finally the conclusion.
So those are my reasons for thinking that this is a very persuasive piece and I'm sure it is going to help me in my writing.
1. I think that It's very persuasive and i brobely would get a cat 2. I think it was written because they might of had the same inquiry as us and someone liked cats 3. I think that the vocabulary is perfect for the artical because it all made sense 4. I would change my vocabulary and put down more ideas for my own
Ok, Room 10, as part of your homework for this week I would like you to carefully read this piece of persuasive writing. You will recognise the topic as it is the same as the topic you have been writing about. You can comment on
ReplyDelete1. If you think it is convincing or not and why?
2. Why you think it was written?
3.What do you think about the language that the author has used in his/her writing
4. After reading this are there any changes you think you may make to yours?
PLEASE REMEMBER TO PUT YOUR NAME AT THE BOTTOM OF YOUR COMMENT!
Delete1.I think yes and no.I think yes because I agree with Quite a few of their points.I think no because they say "most cats" and not all cats so you might have a cat out of the category "most cats".
Delete2.I think it was as an example piece of writing.I also think it was written to convince people that cats make better pets than dogs.
3.I think that the author has used technical language very well.They used lots of different time connectives and used more sophisticated words so they sounded like they knew what they were talking about.
4.I think that I'll use more sophisticated words and try to use facts that include all Cats/dogs.
Melanie
1. Yes,I think this piece of writing is convincing because it made me question my own thoughts about what I had written about dogs.
Delete2. I think this was written so that people like me who are dog lovers will question our thoughts and feelings about cats.
3. I think that the language used in the story is persuasive and catches your attention because the writter is someone who loves cats for example,"they are civilized members of the household", trying to convince the reader thats cats are like people.
4. Even though the story talks about all the positive characteristics of a cat, I still strongly beleive that dogs make better pets for example, cats cant be guide dogs for the blind, they can't be used by the Police and they can't be used as guard dogs. This shows that dogs are more intelligent and that people can trust and depend on dogs.
Fifita Tahaafe
1; I think this piece of writing is very persuasive because the writer highlights the best feature of cats, in some cases where he/she talked bad about cat they gave us alternate information about how we can stop the problem. Also in this text they use long vocabulary words making it sound professional
ReplyDelete2; I think personally this was written because the writer feels dogs are adulated (adored (does adulated make sense?) and wanted to let people know that cats can be just as good as dogs(or way better) and the writer probably owns a cat
3; I think the language used in this text is advanced so that it sounds professional and also the writer has put in lot's of hooks so that readers don't get bored while reading and that these types of words/language was used very well
4; some changes I want to make to mine are mainly using more advanced wording and making more interesting hooks because when I read it .. (well I don't read it because I don't like to)
also I would like to add more detail and reasoning to my points
1: I personally think that this piece of persuasive writing is great !The reason why? , is the author gives us three good reasons why cats are better pets than cats.
ReplyDelete2: I think it was written to show people the options on having a cat in your life, or if you didn't agree to have a dog.
3: The language used in this text is very professional and advanced, so the way the have written it is so you don't get bored so great vocabulary.
4: The changes I would make to mine is expanding my main points by adding more technical vocabulary.
1: i think this is persuasive because it gives more facts about cats then what we could get as a whole class.I also think it is because all the facts written is true and this person does give points.
ReplyDelete2:I think this writing was written for the sake of cats and to persuade people that cats are far better pets then dogs.
3:The language used in this text is very mature and professional.
4:The changes i would of think to make is the changes on my points, to make them bigger and stronger because this person has true and strong points that will just put my writing to sham.Thumbs UP on this persons writing :)
I personally think that the persuasive writing is a good piece of writing because:
ReplyDelete1. it gives yuo three good interesting reasons why cats are better pets than dogs and it makes you fell like getting a cat more than a dog.
2.I think it was written to show the people witch pet to get and i think they want you to get a cat but not a dog.
3. the language that's in the text is very well written because the author uses technical words.
4. the changes i would make to mine is to : add more interesting vocabulary;o
1. I think dogs are still better because they have the same things as a cat but better.
ReplyDelete2. I think they wrote this so they can express there feelings but I think other wise
3. The language is very technical and well used
4. I would use more technical words and hook the crowd in more
I think that It's got a very persuasive introduction , as soon as you read the first 2 sentences you automatically know what the writer is trying to persuade you to do.It should be a little more gripping,so you have no choice whatsoever but to agree with the piece of writing. Apart from that I think it's very good and has nearly got me persuaded!
ReplyDelete1.I think this is not convincing because this person has just talked about little things he or she needs to go into detail.
ReplyDelete2.Well the two important things I picked up is that this person wrote this to argue and to persuade you.
3.The writer has used a lot of technical word to make the reader interested in the argument so no one will get bored.
4.I would like to an more technical language to get the reader hooked into my argument
by Liban da man
I think that is a very persuasive piece because...
ReplyDelete1." A dog is a man's best friend. That common saying may contain some truth ". That hooks you in on the first couple of sentences.
2. The writer uses technical and big words which makes it look professenial also it make the arguement stronger.
3. He/she makes the arguement stronger by stating the facts. Like saying something like " cats clean themselves, the ease of care."
4. Finally the writer makes this arguement better than others by the way the layed it out. The writer has different paragraphs for the Intro, The 3 paragrpahs with the reason and finally the conclusion.
So those are my reasons for thinking that this is a very persuasive piece and I'm sure it is going to help me in my writing.
By Madi.
1. I think that It's very persuasive and i brobely would get a cat
ReplyDelete2. I think it was written because they might of had the same inquiry as us and someone liked cats
3. I think that the vocabulary is perfect for the artical because it all made sense
4. I would change my vocabulary and put down more ideas for my own
tyler hills rm 10
I think that this persuasive piece of writing is persuasive:
ReplyDelete1.Because it has a good hook that can catch the readers attention.
2.This also tells us that the writer has explained why cats are better pets than dogs, and it also has examples to surpport her/his paragarph.
3.It has technical words that makes it more interesting.
4.the changes I want to change to mine is putting more techical words and making my story more detailed for the reader to be hooked in.
By Helena
1. This is a persuasive writing...It gives you the 3 main reason why cats are better than dogs.
ReplyDelete2. I think they wrote this because the people that think dogs are better than cats mind change their mind after reading that persuasive writing.
3. They have used technical words and well used.
4. I would add more interesting vocabulary...and well detailed paragraph. :)
1. I think that was a persuasive writing....it gives 3 main reasonwhy cats are better than dogs.
ReplyDelete2. I think they wrote this because the people that thinks dog are better than cats might change their mind after reading that persuasive writing.
3. They have use technical words and a good conclusion.
4. I would put more good technical words and add more detailed paragraph. :)
i think that it is very persuasive and would strongly get a cat if i diden't have one because the author stats very good and strong reasons.
ReplyDeletesimone
Hi guys! Seems like you've been doing lots of work while I was in India.
ReplyDelete